Відео

Humans are very holy..that's why we shit and pee 😂😂🎉🎉😅

Creationist like fanciful cartoons...😂😂😂😅. Science rules!!!👍🤠👍

Gain of function between the specics

Great talk, so interesting, delivered with passion and enthusiasm

Sorry, but this is worthless info ... An educated guess at best ... Who gives a F on any of this? How has this research EVER benefit man?

So the stories( after stories , after stories, after stories) about humans being responsible for the extinction of megafauna through hunting is....exxagerated?

It's the noses and ears that always get me. Why are ours noses so big, and ears so small, in comparison, despite doing the same job? Breaks the If it aint broke dont fix it rule.

5:51 “ invented by evolution” So we are just going to glance over the fact that a university professor who studied at Oxford and Stanford, who is smart enough to “understand prions and evolution”, talks about it as an “invention”? Wow.

Keep up the wonderful work!

Clearly Dr Selina knows her onions 🧅, fascinating information , thank you very much for this , learnt much today 👌🏻👍🏻😉🇬🇧🫡

Could you do an update with Andrew Pask on the thylacine? I believe there's been some recent findings on that subject

The Damasky group sound like homo Hablius

Chris Stringer is concisely erudite as always: a marvel of memory and explanatory technique. The table of human evolution is especially illuminating. His speculation about Dragon Man = Denisovans tantalizing. What puzzles me is why the work of Dr Lee Berger in South Africa is completely ignored: the discovery of 2 million year old Australopithecus Sideba and 300k year old Homo Naledi. Is it his open research methodology? The holes in his research leading to belligerent claims about his discoveries which challenge orthodox paleoanthropolgy and -ists? I’d really appreciate hearing Dr Stringer’s thoughts on the subject.

Dr Michael Levin

@5:00 the good doctor says " shocks today are among the most ... " but I can't make out the next word or phrase, which is the key point in the sentence. can anyone help clarify?

humans apes but where is people?

So it's all about reproduction?

It probably isn't coincidental that shark populations have declined so much in fifty years, considering the baleful role that Peter Benchley's 1974 novel 'Jaws' and the 1975 film adaptation directed by Steven Spielberg have played in promoting widespread public fear of these animals. Of course, it would be overly simplistic to attribute all blame to these cultural artifacts, but Benchley became aware of how his story was inspiring increased human aggression against sharks, and expressed regret for this before he died in 2006.

A point to consider is the process of evolution does not dismiss the possibility of another species evolving into a higher order of intelligence. Birds, dogs, chimps, gorillas, dolphins, orcas are among the species we train. Their ability to learn human or say higher order choreography is not simply repetition on their part, but also an indication of their possibilities. But dogs and cats as one example have a much higher order of faithfulness and dedication to their providers which our intelligence has stymied.

Thank you Briana Pobiner!

Omg, the Proteine was invented. Send brain!

"We don't know how it happened exactly" therefore the video is not about the origin of the genetic code. It is about working out the original genetic code

Culture vrs race makes a mess of things. I have no problem that people genetically and by default, adapted to their environmental situation, (living intimately with nature), perhaps way back in time, before tech gave us the buffer. But that is all it is, it's about survival in different environments.

Any new information?

Evolution is a joke on humanity, we are all clueless how life started to complex for our little minds.

CREATING & CONTROLING FIRE, AND COOKING IS THE SINGULAR MOST IMPORTANT EVENT IN HUMAN EVOLUTION

Scavenging is also much more efficient in terms of calorie expenditure...Why didn't she mention this

There is no sceletal evidence anywere that shows a monkey turning man no were ever found or even so a birth hapening were a monkey is born from a human mother if u no what i mean.

I enjoyed this quite a bit. I will probably watch it again.

Exposure on my iPad for the skulls & bones is poor; over-exposed .

I breed show chickens, this is so interesting!

As a highly derived cambrian chordate myself I approve of this interview

I'd be really interested to know what the contribution of the locals is. To say this work would be impossible without them is a wild claim

I've seen Jack in a couple of things ---I think also on this channel once before. He seems so young but is obviously very well travelled. I love that this channel gives time to young scientists as well as old 60+ guys like myself!

Always fascinating to hear from shark experts.🎉🎉 The problem of pollution, overfishing and bycatch continues to be a real worry. I love also that the guest is obviously very passionate about conservation. Thank you for the links in the description! 💯

I happened to catch a short documentary on ancient sharks yesterday from someone else I follow. While I knew that ancient sharks could be weird and wonderful, I had no idea how widespread they were. And while the Megalodon is infamous, I also had no idea how many of those different species got big.

Has there been any scientific investigation into the fossilization process itself? I would be interested to know if body fossils undergoe any deformation or volume changes.

They should check out the teeth of homo erectus and see if they were meat eaters or not.

We'll need a bigger boat...

I think blaming the decline of overall shark diversity on megalodon sounds a bit reductive. True megalodon was mighty, but it is nothing compare to geological forces. And although an apex predator can have a profound impact on an ecosystem, they are also the most precarious ecological niche that has a tiny total biomass and high turnover rate. Surely, the formation of the Antarctic ice cap, the fall of sea level and the disappearance of vast nearshore ecosystems, as well as the rise of teleost fish are far more important factors to consider.

Just don't make shark fin soup :(

An interesting Hypotheses that I admit I have wondered about but when asked what Mr Adams proof was he talked about Morphology and geographic distribution neither of which are dependent on distinct lineages of Hominid so neither of which are any kind of proof. If there was any relevant evidence DNA would have found it. My Hypotheses is that we evolved from an Aquatic Primate and that our hairlessness and our bipedalism come not from crossing Savannas or walking on branches to keep our hands free; But from our wading through water . On the coste you avoid land predators by wading out to sea and avoid sea predators by going on land. Costal foraging is far more labour rewarding than inland foraging and you are always beside an escape route. It might be more than just conservation bias that all out earliest footprints where made in mud or verry shallow water by our ancestors that need not have been travelling but could just as easily been living in that environment by tradition. If we where a coastal species by time we where modern man we would long have learnt to build sea going craft so our costal migration could be hundreds or many thousands of years before any significant moves inland. Any conservation bias is likely to be supportive of a land Ape due to sea level rises meaning that the cost line our Ancestors followed are deep under the Oceans today. Ps the oldest piece of worked wood ever found looks remarkably like the joint between a Stabiliser and a Stretcher on traditional Canoes' from around the World today. We need more proof for any Hypotheses, my feeling is that a lot of it will comb from Marine Archaeology.

Absolute science fiction, a mathematician who should know the folding of proteins by any other method than intelligent agency is utterly IMPOSSIBLE. How did the first ever molecular machine construct itself? Imagine being so low in common sense that you ascribe creative powers to 'no-thing', evolution 'invented', so evolution has a mind? Hold a smartphone in one hand and a chicken egg in the other, we can make one but the other is too complex. A single cell is literally a 'nano city', if you shrunk New York City down to the size of a human cell they would share similar complexity. What sort of mind entertains the idea that complexity beyond human capabilities 'invented' itself? If either of these people in the video came across a single sheet of paper with the word 'hello' printed on it, they would intuitively understand the source must be intelligent agency. The information within a single human cell requires 1.5 MILLION sheets of paper to print out but according to them the source is not intelligent agency. The source of information is always intelligent agency, an observational fact for all of recorded time.

why hunt and expend all that energy. Scaveging and scaring off predators from their kill is much smarter

Nice to know that the next time someone accuses me of cultural appropriation for my dreads i can tell them my ancestors have been wearing them for hundreds of millions of years 😂🤢

So, it is very important because everyone wants to know.

Absolutely fascinating discussion! Professor Chris Stringer’s insights on the Dragon Man and its place in our evolutionary history are mind-blowing. The idea that this ancient species might reshape our understanding of human ancestry is so exciting! It’s incredible how much we’re still learning about our past. Thanks for bringing this topic to light - can’t wait to see what future discoveries reveal!

Origins of the genetic code... The intelligent designer thought and thought and thought.

I would imagine the type of blades used by Neanderthals and their hunting style would be governed by the prey they hunted. A large mammoth may not be stopped by a dainty blade thrown. Most likely they needed a heavy blade which needed pushing hard through the mammoths thick skin and fat layer.

NOT the LAST...there is compelling evidence that Almas/Almasty/Kaptar still survive to this day in the remote Caucasus mountains...